BenchmarksGovernance
Benchmark Report · Governance

The Founder Governance Report

Governance is not bureaucracy. It is the agreement, in advance, of how decisions get made when founders disagree. Most Irish teams do not have one.

Updated 03 May 2026 9 min read Sources tagged inline
Headline benchmarks
≈ 76%
PR
of two-founder Irish teams have no documented reserved matters
≈ 81%
PR
of 50/50 teams have no tie-break
≈ 22%
PR
have a written founders' agreement before incorporation

Governance is the structural cost most founders refuse to pay until they have to. The cheapest version is a one-page founders' agreement before incorporation. The most expensive is a deadlocked board fourteen months in.

What governance preparedness actually looks like

  • A documented reserved matters list
  • A tie-break or chair with casting vote in 50/50 teams
  • An agreed escalation path for material disagreements
  • A leaver mechanic for both good and bad leavers
  • A pre-agreed information rights regime
Chart

Governance items in place at incorporation

PR
Founders' agreement (written)22%
Reserved matters list24%
Tie-break in 50/50 teams19%
Documented leaver mechanic26%
Vesting36%
For journalists & researchers

Cite this report

Suggested citation: Source: The Founder Governance Report, PartnerReady (2026), partnerready.ie/founder-governance-report

Media enquiry

Frequently asked questions

Is governance only relevant after a fundraise?+

No. The structural protections that prevent founder disputes are most valuable before there is anything to dispute over.

What single governance item matters most for 50/50 teams?+

A tie-break or casting vote, paired with a reserved matters list. Without one, every meaningful disagreement becomes a structural deadlock.

Convert

If these benchmarks feel familiar

The PartnerReady diagnostic usually surfaces the underlying structural risks in under ten minutes. The founders most likely to avoid disputes are the founders willing to have the difficult conversations early.