BenchmarksDeadlock
Benchmark Report · Deadlock

The Irish Founder Deadlock Report

Why deadlocks happen in Irish two-founder teams, how they typically unwind, and the structural mechanisms that prevent them.

Updated 04 May 2026 8 min read Sources tagged inline
Headline benchmarks
≈ 81%
PR
of 50/50 Irish teams have no tie-break mechanism
≈ 38%
PR
of deadlocks reduce to a missing tie-break
9–14 mo
EST
typical resolution time once a structural deadlock is raised

A deadlock is rarely a single disagreement. It is the structural absence of any pre-agreed mechanism for resolving disagreement. By the time a deadlock is visible, the team has usually been quietly avoiding it for months.

Distribution

Why deadlocks happen

PR
  • No tie-break38%
  • No reserved matters27%
  • No chair / casting vote18%
  • No escalation path17%

Mechanisms that prevent deadlock

  • A casting vote with the chair, rotated annually
  • A reserved matters list requiring unanimity only on truly fundamental items
  • An external escalation path (advisor, board observer, mediator)
  • A pre-agreed buy-sell mechanic for terminal deadlock
For journalists & researchers

Cite this report

Suggested citation: Source: The Irish Founder Deadlock Report, PartnerReady (2026), partnerready.ie/founder-deadlock-report-ireland

Media enquiry

Frequently asked questions

Is a 50/50 split inherently deadlock-prone?+

Only without governance protection. 50/50 splits with a chair, casting vote and reserved matters list operate well.

What is the cheapest deadlock prevention?+

A one-page reserved matters list and a pre-agreed escalation path, both signed before incorporation.

Convert

If these benchmarks feel familiar

The PartnerReady diagnostic usually surfaces the underlying structural risks in under ten minutes. The founders most likely to avoid disputes are the founders willing to have the difficult conversations early.